The case laws on temporary resicence ordinance 2015 Diaries
The case laws on temporary resicence ordinance 2015 Diaries
Blog Article
“There is not any ocular evidence to show that Muhammad Abbas was murdered by any in the present petitioners. Mere fact that Noor Muhammad and Muhammad Din saw firstly the deceased and after a ways they observed the petitioners going towards the same direction, didn't indicate that the petitioners were chasing the deceased or were accompanying him. Such evidence cannot be treated as evidence of very last seen.
The court emphasised that in cases of intentional murder, the gravity in the offense demands the most stringent punishment, considering the sanctity of human life and deterrence for likely offenders.
In this landmark case, the Supreme Court commuted the death sentence to life imprisonment about the grounds of extenuating circumstances. The court acknowledged that while the crime of murder was established, the offender had a history of mental illness, which played a significant role in committing the offense. This case established a precedent for taking into consideration mitigating factors during sentencing.
Even though there is no prohibition against referring to case legislation from a state other than the state in which the case is being heard, it holds minor sway. Still, if there is no precedent from the home state, relevant case regulation from another state could possibly be considered because of the court.
criminal revision application is dismissed. reduced on the period of his detention in jail he has already undergone(Criminal Revision )
Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming towards the main case, It is usually a effectively-founded proposition of legislation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has here jurisdiction, power, and authority to reach a finding of fact or conclusion. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of the fact or evidence inside the Stricto-Sensu, utilize to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and conclusion obtain support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty on the charge, however, that is topic on the procedure provided under the relevant rules rather than otherwise, for that reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not act as appellate authority to re-appreciate the evidence and to arrive at its independent findings within the evidence.
only around the ground of miscases remanded & only to the ground of misreading of evidence only around the ground of misreading of evidence . disposed of(Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance, 1979)
Extra username and password are necessary for this resource. See Username and password webpage for details
Online access towards the case management system for the Court of Appeals of Virginia. Cases might be searched using name or case number.
Knowledge on the accused is a matter to become inferred from the circumstances, for it being a state of mind, is quite challenging to be proved otherwise.”
Case law, also known as precedent, forms the foundation in the Pakistani legal system. Understanding relevant judgments and rulings is very important for interpreting statutes and predicting legal outcomes. Free access to these resources democratizes legal knowledge, empowering citizens and advertising transparency.
کیا ایف آئی آر درخواست گزار کی رپورٹ پر درج کی گئی تھی اور اگر ہاں تو کیا اسے اس کے خلاف ثبوت کے طور پر استعمال کیا جا سکتا ہے؟
This landmark case expanded the fundamental rights to life and dignity by interpreting these rights to encompass the right to some healthy environment. This decision is particularly significant as there aren't any specific provisions during the Pakistani Constitution regarding environmental protection. In relation to environmental law in Pakistan, it really is important that the case proven the application of the precautionary principle where there is actually a risk to environmental rights, and emphasised the positive obligations in the State in protecting the right to your clean and healthy environment.
This section specifically relates to civil servants who will be rendered surplus because of the reorganization or abolition of a division, department, or office. Non-civil servants, by definition, will not be issue towards the provisions on the Civil Servants Act. Their terms and conditions of service are typically governed by separate contracts or agreements with the using organization. Therefore, the provisions of Section eleven-A, such as the possibility of being posted to another department, would not apply to non-civil servants. Read more